FE
FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM)·Q1 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 FY26 revenue was $13.8M and diluted EPS was $0.07, down from $15.1M and $0.25 YoY and from Q4 FY25’s $20.0M and $0.34 QoQ, driven by pulled-forward shipments in Q4 and customer-driven program delays in Q1 that management says are timing-related, not cancellations .
- Against S&P Global consensus, revenue missed ($13.8M vs $16.5M*) and EPS missed ($0.07 vs $0.36*), with only one estimate on each metric; management emphasized backlog strength and timing normalization in coming quarters (Values retrieved from S&P Global)* .
- Backlog remains historically high at ~$71M (vs $70M at FY-end), and FEI announced a $20M share repurchase authorization, signaling confidence and capital return alongside growth investments .
- Strategic initiatives advanced: opening of Boulder engineering facility staffed with former NIST scientists, expected to be accretive by Q3 FY26; continued pursuit of externally funded R&D in quantum sensing; ongoing bids on larger, multi-year defense programs .
- Narrative catalysts: near-term resolution of delayed programs, potential expansion of at least one program’s total contract value, Boulder ramp by Q3, and new program wins in space/non-space defense; investor-day style visibility via October Quantum Sensing Summit .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Backlog resilience: funded backlog was ~$71M at quarter-end, slightly up from ~$70M at April 30, 2025, supporting visibility into revenue conversion .
- Strategic hiring and footprint expansion: Boulder engineering facility opened, staffed with NIST veterans; management expects positive bottom-line contribution by Q3 FY26 .
- Capital return: new $20M share repurchase authorization alongside a debt-free balance sheet and prior special dividends, signaling confidence and balanced capital allocation .
- Quote: “Make no mistake, this is not your grandfather’s Frequency Electronics, Inc. We have fundamentally transformed this business... to be a larger, more profitable, more cash-generative company... for years to come.” .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue/EPS miss vs estimates and YoY/QoQ declines: revenue was $13.8M and EPS $0.07 vs consensus $16.5M and $0.36*, largely due to customer-driven delays and Q4 pull-forward (Values retrieved from S&P Global)*.
- Gross margin rate compression to ~36.8% (from 44.4% YoY) on mix shift and lower volume; SG&A ratio stepped up to ~26% (from ~19%) on growth investments (Colorado/quantum) and payroll .
- Limited coverage (one estimate per metric) likely amplified perceived surprise; investors may scrutinize timing cadence and dependency on government program cycles .
Financial Results
Consolidated P&L and Margins (YoY and QoQ)
Estimates vs Actuals (S&P Global)
Segment Mix and Revenue
Key KPIs and Balance Sheet Highlights
Guidance Changes
Management reiterated a non-guidance stance due to lumpy contract timing; they expect delayed program revenue to be recognized predominantly within FY26 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Prepared remarks emphasized timing issues over structural demand: “This quarter... is simply a timing issue... customer-driven delays... neither cancellations, nor contract reductions... we expect at least one of these programs to be expanded significantly...” .
- Strategic positioning: “We have fundamentally transformed this business... to be a larger, more profitable, more cash-generative company...” and “our opportunity set is... the best in our industry” .
- Mission-critical relevance: “Time is the invisible utility that keeps the world running... Our technologies in alternative PNT and quantum-enhanced timing are designed precisely to close these vulnerabilities” .
- Capital allocation: “$20 million authorization for the repurchase of shares... committed to both investing for the future and returning cash to shareholders” .
- Boulder ramp: “We anticipate that the Boulder facility will contribute positively to the bottom line by the third quarter of this fiscal year” .
Q&A Highlights
- Productization timelines: Mercury Ion atomic clock prototypes with JPL; low-rate production anticipated in ~1 year; NV Diamond magnetometer prototypes targeted by mid-next calendar year, with next-gen devices ~1 year after .
- Quantum computing scope: Not directly investing; focusing on quantum sensing with potential future applicability; Colorado hiring to build workforce with relevant expertise .
- Tone: Confident, focused on near-term resolution of delays and medium-term product pipeline; limited Q&A depth given single analyst participant .
Estimates Context
- Results vs consensus: Revenue $13.8M vs $16.5M*; EPS $0.07 vs $0.36*, both misses on limited coverage (one estimate each) (Values retrieved from S&P Global)*.
- Expected estimate revisions: Likely downward near term on Q1 reset, with potential upward bias later in FY26 if delayed programs convert and Boulder contributions begin in Q3 .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q1 underperformance was timing-related, not demand-related; management expects revenue to be recognized predominantly in FY26 as customer-driven delays abate .
- Backlog and pipeline are strong, including larger, multi-year defense programs (Golden Dome, Patriot, B-2, THAAD), supporting revenue visibility and diversification .
- Investment phase and mix shifts drove near-term margin compression; watch SG&A intensity and GM rate as volumes normalize .
- Boulder facility and quantum sensing initiatives are strategic growth vectors; profitability contribution targeted by Q3 FY26—track milestones and external funding wins .
- Capital return remains an incremental positive: $20M buyback authorization on a debt-free balance sheet provides downside support and signals confidence .
- Trading implications: Near-term sentiment may reflect the miss vs consensus; potential rebound catalysts include new awards, resolution of delayed programs, and October Summit visibility .
- Medium-term thesis: Mission-critical PNT/quantum timing solutions with increased geopolitical relevance; improved execution cadence and productization could drive sustained revenue growth and margin uplift over FY26-27 .